This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Framework Benchmarks. How much does your framework choice affect performance? Authors Note: Were using the word "framework" loosely to refer to platforms, micro-frameworks, and full-stack frameworks. We have our own personal favorites among these frameworks, but weve tried our best to give each a fair shot.
Last week, we posted the results of benchmarking several web application development and frameworks. On i7, we see that several frameworks are able to provide a response in under 10 milliseconds. Only Cake PHP requires more than 100 milliseconds. As before, Raw PHP is also very strong in this test.
You are viewing the first round of web application framework benchmarks. Check out the new stand-alone framework benchmarks site if you are interested in the latest and most accurate data. How much does your framework choice affect performance? How much does your framework choice affect performance? Motivation.
Merry Christmas webframework performance aficionados! What better way to celebrate the holidays than by cheering on your favorites as they race through a variety of application fundamentals in the biggest web platform grudge match of the season? Round 7 was missing some of the Go frameworks due to configuration problems.
We’ve posted Round 4 of our ongoing project measuring the performance of many web application frameworks and platforms. As with previous rounds, the developer community has contributed several additional frameworks for Round 4, bringing the total to 57! View Round 4 results now. Round 4 notes and observations.
We''ve previously posted two rounds of results of benchmarking many web application platforms and frameworks. Speaking of pull requests, we received tests for several additional frameworks since Round 2 and we have posted Round 3. If we''re missing your favorite frameworks, we would love to receive a pull request.
Round 11 of the ongoing WebFramework Benchmarks project is now available! Meanwhile, the total number of frameworks has increased by 26. The new frameworks are: silicon (C++). clancats (php). limonade (php). The new frameworks are: silicon (C++). clancats (php). limonade (php).
In WebFramework Benchmarks , there are some very interesting and surprising numbers around the performance of various webframeworks. And I hope you are not running on Cake PHP when you see these numbers. In some ways, this frees us from worrying as much about the specific framework that's being used.
Round 12 of the ongoing WebFramework Benchmarks project is now available! The plain PHP, Slim, and Laravel tests have been upgraded to PHP 7. For example, Slim's performance in the JSON test and Laravel's performance in the Fortunes test both approximately doubled versus Round 11 with PHP 5. Other notable changes.
Realtime , a startup developing technology to help power real-time web applications, said today that it has raised $100M, launched in the U.S., The firm, which was previously known as Internet Business Technologies, said that it has developed a language, xRTML, that helps convert existing, static HTML into real-time, live web applications.
Developers interact with the operating systems directly, build/use their own frameworks (eg, Django, Rails, etc), and consume server resources directly. The developer doesn’t have to manage compute resources directly Instead she gets to build on frameworks specifically provided for her application.
Technologies used: node.js, web sockets. Java Web App built on the Spring Framework. Tecnologies used: Python, Pyramid, Google Direction API, Amazon Web Services, Html5, and JQuery. Technologies used: Augmented Reaity, geolocation, open graph, php, jquery, and Native IOS. Backed by a scalable mySQL.
From code, to web and application servers, databases and frameworks. Web serving source files. A web server that is not configured to run a technology in a desired endpoint might serve the file back to the client instead of executing it. This can include compiled class files, php code and more.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content